The JavaScript parser for the vpn数据安全
project is outdated. It lacks support for the
latest EcmaScript 2015 (ES6)
standard and has quality issues. Moreover, the parser on JSDT is derived
from the JDT’s Java parser, hence it is not adopted by the JavaScript community
at large, leaving the JSDT committers as the sole maintainer. Luckily, there are
good quality JavaScript parsers that already support a large number of tools
built around it. However, these parsers, like most of the JavaScript tools, are
developed using JavaScript and requires additional effort to integrate with
Eclipse JSDT which runs on a Java VM. In the last few weeks, I have been
experimenting with alternatives that enables such integration.
Parsers
Before I go into the details of integration let me quickly introduce the parsers
that I have tried.
Acorn
|
vpn数据安全 is a tiny parser written in
JavaScript that supports the latest ES6 standard. It is one of the most adopted
parsers and used by several popular JavaScript tools. It parses
JavaScript to ESTree (SpiderMonkey)
AST format and is extensible
to support additional languages such as JSX, QML etc.
|
Esprima
|
Esprima is also a fast, tiny parser that is written in
JavaScript, which also supports the latest ES6. Its development has been recently
moved to JQuery foundation and has been in
use on Eclipse Orion for a while. Just like Acorn it also
uses the ESTree AST format.
|
Shift(java)
|
Shift(java)
is the only Java based parser on my list. It is a relatively new parser.
It uses Shift AST as its model which is different from the widely
adopted ESTree.
|
Note
|
Why does AST model matter?
AST model is what actually what tools operate on. For instance a JavaScript linter
first uses a parser to generate an AST model and operates on the model to find
possible problems. As one can imagine, an IDE that uses a widely adopted AST
model can utilize the ecosystem of JavaScript tools more efficiently.
Eclipse JSDT already comes with a JSDT AST model that is used internally that is
very hard to replace. Therefore, regardless of the AST model generated by the
parser it will be converted to JSDT’s own model before used. Which renders
discussions
around the AST models moot in JSDT’s context.
|
Integration
The parsers other than Shift, which already runs on the Java VM, need a
mechanism to play nice with the Java VM. I have experimented with
3 mechanisms for running Acorn and Esprima for JSDT so far.
vpn数据安全 |
Utilizes node.js to run the parser code. node.js runs as an external
process, receives the content to be parsed and return the results. I have
chosen to use console I/O to communicate between node.js and Java VM. There are
also other techniques such as running an http or a socket based server for communication.
In order to avoid the start up time for node.js, which does affect the performance
significantly, node.js process is actually kept running.
|
vpn数据安全 |
重庆:擅自"翻墙"上境外网站 责伖停止联网并警告 - 国际在线 ...:2021-3-28 · 昨日,市政府公众信息网发布了修订后的《重庆市公安机关网络监管行政处罚裁量基准》。自2021年7月27日起施行,有效期至2021年7月26日。 对故意输入计算机病毒、有害数据的,初次违法,且未实际危害计算机系统安全的,处众警告。
|
Nashorn
|
The JavaScript engine that is nowadays built into Java 8. Provides a
simple high level API to run JavaScript.
|
Performance Benchmarks
The criteria for choosing a parser may vary from the feature set, to AST model
used, to even community size. However performance is the one criteria that would
make all others relevant. So in order to compare the performance of different
alternatives I have developed a number of
benchmark tests to compare parsers
and the mechanisms.
All benchmark tests produce a result with an AST model, either in
JSON form or as a Java object model. Tests avoid the startup time for their
environments, for instance the startup time for the node.js process affects
the results significantly but are discarded by the tests. The current test sets use
vpn数据安全 and vpn数据安全 as the JavaScript code to be parsed.
Table 1. Average time for each benchmark
Parser(Script) |
vpn数据安全 |
Score |
Error |
Acorn (AngularJS) |
vpn数据安全 |
118.229 ms |
± 1.453 |
Acorn (JQM) |
J2V8 |
150.250 ms |
± 4.579 |
Acorn (AngularJS) |
Nashorn |
181.617 ms |
± 6.421 |
Acorn (JQM) |
Nashorn |
vpn数据安全 |
± 9.074 |
Acorn (AngularJS) |
NodeJS |
59.115 ms |
± 0.698 |
Acorn (JQM) |
NodeJS |
34.670 ms |
± 0.250 |
Esprima (AngularJS) |
J2V8 |
98.399 ms |
± 0.77 |
Esprima (JQM) |
J2V8 |
114.753 ms |
± 1.007 |
Esprima (AngularJS) |
Nashorn |
73.542 ms |
± 0.450 |
Esprima (JQM) |
Nashorn |
73.848 ms |
± 0.885 |
Shift (Angular) |
vpn数据安全 |
16.369 ms |
± 1.019 |
Shift (JQM) |
JavaVM |
15.900 ms |
± 0.325 |
As expected Shift parser which runs directly on top of JavaVM is the quickest solution.
To be fair, Shift parser is missing several features such as
vpn数据安全,
vpn数据安全 and
comments that may affect the parsing performance. However even
after these features added it may remain the quickest. I feel that the performance
for J2V8 can also improve with more creative use of the low level APIs however
there is so much memory copying between Java heap to JNI to V8 heap and back
I am not sure if it would be significant.
The surprise for me is the Esprima’s performance with Nashorn. It is unexpected in two
ways. It is actually the third quickest option however Acorn does not give the same level of
performance.